|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Click here to view a copy of the full NSW Farmers Position Statement...
Native Vegatation Survey
There is a Native Vegatation Survey currently being conducted by the NSW Government.
Click here to go to the survey...
Native Vegatation Priority Areas
The objectives of the Native Vegatation priority areas are to:
- progressively improve the native vegetation system and legislation
- develop effective invasive native species (INS) policy
- develop effective private native forestry (PNF) policy
- lobby for improved landscape vegetation management planning
Native Vegetation Reforms
The NSW Government has announced a review of native vegetation laws. To help us put forward a constructive position, NSW Farmers will be holding workshops around the state to discuss our position with members.
See below section for more information...
Native Vegetation Reading Material
NSW Farmers recommends downloading and reading the below material on Native Vegatation. We also encourage you to read NSW Farmers’ proposal and provide feedback via the Association's Member Service Centre or your elected representatives.
- Native vegetation – policy background
- Native vegetation – current regulatory framework
- Native vegetation – current NSW Farmers policies
- Native vegetation – summary of NSW Farmers’ Green Paper
- Reform of NSW Native Vegetation Legislation – NSW Farmers Green Paper
Senate Inquiry: Native Vegetation Laws, Greenhouse Gas Abatement and Climate Change Measures
The Senate Finance and Public Administration References Committee has released its report into Native Vegetation Laws, Greenhouse Gas Abatement and Climate Change Measures. The report makes three recommendations aimed at addressing current legislation’s imbalance between conservation and agricultural production and recognising the need for future regulatory activities to be reoriented to focus on stewardship initiatives. Click here for further information.
Native Vegetation Legislation - the great cost shift
The Association continues to fight against the government shifting the cost of public conservation on private land holders and failing to apply ‘triple bottom line’ sustainability principles when implementing native vegetation controls.
The Productivity Commission, in its major report, Impacts of Native Vegetation and Biodiversity Regulations (2004) found that native vegetation legislation imposed unreasonable costs on farmers and was an inefficient way of achieving public conservation outcomes in rural Australia. To illustrate, economic analysis undertaken by the Commission found that prohibitions on broadscale clearing could reduce the present value of expected net returns (2003 dollars) to land, capital and management (over a 40-year period) in Moree Plains Shire (NSW) by $27–$84 million, depending on the productivity of newly-cleared land, and by $42–$124 million in Murweh Shire (Queensland).
The Commission concluded that better environmental outcomes could be achieved at less cost to the community overall and landholders in particular. It recommended that a priority was to remove impediments to private conservation (imposed by the current laws); developing a formal process for equitably sharing costs; and properly considering social and economic impacts in relation to clearing approvals.
Governments Australia wide have continued to ignore these recommendations.
